Difference Between Critical and Descriptive Writing

Generally, the most common reason for marks associated deduction in academic writing is the absence of critical thinking. Most students, instead of evaluating things through critical thinking, just state the facts and evidence to strengthen their work. Descriptive writing is not the wrong way to attempt a question, it just sometimes fails to fulfil the requirements of a module. Addition of critical thinking in your work while evaluating something, makes it more precise and acceptable by the institutions. This essay will highlight some distinguishing features of both types of writing so that even a beginner can differentiate between the aims of descriptive, and critical writings. The establishment of equilibrium between descriptive and critical writing in a single piece of writing can help even an average student in getting class distinction. Hence, good academic piece of writing must be a perfect blend of both descriptive and critical writing.

Descriptive writing is an essential part of academic writing, as without description, no one can state evidence and supporting details to highlight the significance of a topic or rationale. The background and significance of a topic under study is the matter of descriptive writing. The essence of such writing is that in this, you are just describing events, others' work, possibilities, steps to achieve specific goals, as well as happenings without adding your flavour or transformation. A writer uses descriptive assignment writing services to tell the reader what a problem is. It also includes what you have previously studied about a particular process and mostly considered as a part of reflective essay and blog writing. Argumentative claims and comparisons between two things are outside the field of descriptive writing. Some important features of descriptive writings are enlisted in Table 1 below;

To increase the validity of research work, you must conclude things critically and include argumentative claims so that readers can pick your points of discussion. In critical writing, you are convincing the reader about your in-hand knowledge on the topic of interest. This evaluation simply means measuring the weightage of two facts, by comparing, debating, and transforming findings of other credible knowledge pools. To increase validity of the research, critical evaluation describes how much the given evidence is useful for proving the issue you have highlighted. A general way to do critical analysis is to use evaluation or findings from secondary sources and develop your arguments by using these evaluations. Being critical simply means you can support or oppose an author’s points of view but unfortunately most students think everything is right and hence they fail to establish contradictory arguments. Some important distinguishing features of critical writing are enlisted in Table 2 below;

Both descriptive and critical dissertation proposal writing services styles are very important in academic writing, and no one can produce something impressive without a proper understanding of these types. It is important to note that a homogenous blend of both types is essential within academic writing. The difference between descriptive and critical writing helps writers create a balanced essay. These differences can be highlighted as follows;